SKN | Stablecoins Lack Clear Use Case and Interoperability, Says DBS CEO

As digital currencies continue to disrupt traditional banking, one of Asia’s largest financial institutions is sounding a note of caution. DBS Group CEO Piyush Gupta has questioned the real-world utility and interoperability of stablecoins, suggesting that their role in the global financial system remains unclear. His remarks highlight the ongoing debate over how digital assets can fit within regulated banking frameworks while maintaining stability, security, and transparency.

Understanding Stablecoins and Their Purpose

Stablecoins are digital currencies designed to maintain a fixed value by being pegged to traditional assets such as the U.S. dollar or gold. Their goal is to combine the benefits of cryptocurrency—speed, decentralization, and transparency—with the reliability of fiat money. However, according to Gupta, the majority of stablecoins have yet to prove that they offer practical advantages over existing digital payment systems or bank deposits.

In recent years, financial institutions have explored how stablecoins could simplify cross-border payments, reduce settlement times, and lower transaction costs. Yet, the DBS chief argues that these benefits are not being fully realized due to fragmentation in the ecosystem. “There’s a lack of interoperability,” Gupta said, referring to the inability of stablecoins to move seamlessly between platforms and institutions. Without standardization or clear regulatory alignment, he warned, stablecoins risk remaining niche instruments rather than mainstream financial tools.

Impact on Banks and the Financial System

Banks face a unique challenge when it comes to integrating digital currencies. On one hand, they recognize the demand for faster, cheaper transactions and are exploring blockchain and distributed ledger technologies. On the other hand, stablecoins introduce regulatory uncertainty, potential risks to deposits, and exposure to untested systems. Gupta emphasized that without proper oversight and a clear legal framework, stablecoins could undermine financial stability rather than strengthen it.

Traditional banking systems already provide secure credit, deposit insurance, and mechanisms to protect customer funds—advantages most stablecoin issuers cannot guarantee. Regulators, including central banks, are therefore stepping up efforts to ensure that any integration of digital currencies into the financial system does not compromise liquidity or the safety of checking accounts and loans.

The Broader Economic and Technological Context

Despite the skepticism, the interest in digital banking innovation remains strong. Many banks are experimenting with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which could offer a safer, regulated alternative to stablecoins. Unlike privately issued tokens, CBDCs would be backed directly by national monetary authorities, ensuring trust and stability. As global interest rates fluctuate and technology reshapes financial services, the balance between innovation and regulation will define the next chapter of banking evolution.

Closing Insights

Gupta’s remarks underscore a key truth: technology alone cannot replace the trust and stability underpinning modern banking. While stablecoins promise efficiency, they must overcome challenges of interoperability, governance, and transparency before achieving widespread adoption. For investors and institutions alike, the future lies not in choosing between banks and blockchain—but in finding ways to merge the best of both worlds. As digital banking continues to mature, collaboration between regulators, banks, and innovators will be essential to ensure sustainable growth and financial stability.

Previous Post SKN | Green Finance Slowdown Expected to Push China to Seek Overseas Investment

Next Post SKN | How Banks Can Prepare for the Quantum Cyber Threat