SKN | Goldman Sachs Delivers Record Year in Banking and Trading as Volatility and Deal Flow Align

Key Takeaways

• Goldman Sachs recorded its strongest year in global banking and markets since the financial crisis, driven by trading volatility and revived M&A activity.

• Investment banking backlog reached a four-year high, signaling durable advisory momentum into 2026.

• Equities and financing revenues underscore Goldman’s leverage to active markets rather than balance-sheet risk-taking.

Record Performance Confirms Strategic Positioning

Goldman Sachs delivered a record year across its Global Banking and Markets division, reinforcing its position as one of the primary beneficiaries of active capital markets. Full-year revenue in the division reached approximately $41.45 billion in 2025, up 18% from the prior year, marking the strongest performance since 2009.

The results reflect a firm that is structurally positioned to monetize volatility, client activity, and complex transactions rather than rely on directional market bets. For investors, this distinction matters as markets move deeper into a more selective phase of the cycle.

Investment Banking Backlog Signals Continuity

Goldman reported that its investment banking fees backlog increased again in the fourth quarter, driven primarily by advisory mandates. The firm now holds its largest advisory backlog in four years, offering early visibility into revenue durability beyond the current reporting period.

Investment banking fees rose 21% year over year to $9.3 billion, supported by a resurgence in large-scale mergers and acquisitions alongside stronger debt and equity underwriting. Initial public offering activity also contributed, signaling broader corporate confidence after a subdued prior cycle.

For allocators, backlog strength reduces reliance on quarter-to-quarter deal timing and supports confidence in 2026 earnings carryover.

Equities and Financing Deliver Structural Strength

Goldman’s equities franchise was a standout. Equities intermediation revenue rose 18% year over year, while equities financing surged 31%, reflecting elevated client demand for derivatives, hedging, and balance-sheet solutions.

Derivatives activity was a key driver, highlighting Goldman’s ability to capture fee-based revenues during periods of heightened volatility. Financing activity across fixed income, currencies, and commodities also reached a record $4.25 billion, underscoring the breadth of the firm’s trading platform.

Notably, this performance was achieved without a return to pre-crisis proprietary risk-taking, reinforcing the quality of earnings.

Market Context: Trading, Not Leverage, Is Driving Returns

The record results place Goldman in a favorable position relative to peers that are more dependent on balance-sheet spread income or consumer credit dynamics. In an environment where investors are increasingly discriminating between cyclical exposure and structural capability, Goldman’s earnings profile remains tied to activity levels rather than credit expansion.

This distinction is particularly relevant as expectations around rate cuts, geopolitical risk, and episodic volatility continue to shape market behavior in 2026.

Forward-Looking Perspective

Goldman Sachs’ 2025 performance highlights a model built for complex, active markets rather than linear growth environments. With advisory backlog elevated and trading franchises firing across asset classes, the firm enters 2026 with operational momentum and strategic clarity.

For sophisticated investors, the takeaway is less about peak earnings and more about durability: Goldman’s results demonstrate that periods of volatility and uncertainty continue to favor institutions with scale, execution depth, and global client reach.

For a confidential discussion on how global investment banks like Goldman Sachs fit within a diversified financial allocation focused on market activity rather than credit risk, contact our senior advisory team.

Previous Post SKN | HSBC’s WeLab Investment: Strategic Fintech Exposure or Ecosystem Optionality?

Next Post SKN | $6 Trillion at Risk: What Stablecoins Could Mean for Global Bank Deposits