Takeaways
-
Prediction markets can surface real-time sentiment that traditional surveys and forecasts often miss.
-
Market-based probabilities may help investors stress-test scenarios rather than chase headlines.
-
Treating prediction markets as investable signals rather than context can distort decision-making and increase risk.
Prediction Markets Enter the Mainstream Conversation
Prediction markets such as Polymarket are increasingly drawing attention from investors seeking alternative signals on elections, economic data, and policy outcomes. Unlike polls or analyst forecasts, these markets aggregate the views of participants willing to put capital behind their expectations, producing implied probabilities that update continuously.
That growing visibility has prompted senior industry voices to weigh in, including Charles Schwab CEO Rick Wurster, who recently outlined where prediction markets can add value — and where they may mislead.
What Makes Sense for Investors
From Wurster’s perspective, one constructive aspect of prediction markets is their ability to reflect collective expectations in real time. Because prices move as new information emerges, these markets can sometimes react faster than traditional research notes or opinion polls. For investors, this can provide a useful temperature check on how likely certain outcomes are perceived to be at any given moment.
Another element that “makes sense” is using prediction markets as a scenario tool rather than a forecast. By observing how probabilities shift, investors can think more clearly about risk ranges and alternative outcomes. This framing can encourage better preparation, particularly around macro events that influence markets indirectly, such as elections, regulatory changes, or central bank decisions.
Where the Risks Begin
The concern, according to Wurster, arises when investors start to treat prediction market prices as signals to trade on directly. These markets are often thin, vulnerable to sudden swings, and influenced by participants with motivations very different from long-term investors. Liquidity constraints and headline-driven speculation can exaggerate moves that have little relevance to fundamentals.
There is also a behavioural risk. Prediction markets can amplify short-term narratives, tempting investors to anchor portfolios to probabilities that may shift rapidly or fail to translate into economic outcomes. In that sense, they risk encouraging reactive decision-making rather than disciplined portfolio construction.
How Investors Might Use Them Wisely
Viewed through a traditional investing lens, prediction markets may be most useful as a complementary input. They can help frame questions, highlight where consensus is fragile, or reveal when expectations have become crowded. What they are less suited for is acting as a replacement for fundamental analysis, valuation work, or long-term strategy.
As interest grows, the distinction between informational value and speculative distraction becomes increasingly important. Used carefully, prediction markets can sharpen perspective. Used carelessly, they can blur it.
For a confidential discussion on how alternative market signals, behavioural risks, and event-driven probabilities can be incorporated — or filtered out — within a disciplined global portfolio strategy, contact our senior advisory team.
