A Reckoning for Australian Finance: The Banking Royal Commission

The Australian financial services industry, long considered a bastion of stability and resilience, underwent a profound and necessary reckoning. The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, formally established in 2017, served as a searing indictment of a sector that had, in many respects, lost its ethical compass. Led by former High Court Justice Kenneth Hayne, the commission’s work exposed a pervasive culture where the relentless pursuit of profit was consistently prioritized over the interests and well-being of customers. This inquiry triggered a deep loss of public trust and set in motion a series of radical reforms that continue to reshape the entire financial landscape of Australia.

The Genesis of an Inquiry: A Public Outcry

The decision to launch a Royal Commission was not made lightly. It came after years of mounting public pressure and a succession of high-profile scandals that painted a bleak picture of the financial sector. Investigative journalists, whistleblowers, and a growing number of consumer complaints had revealed a disturbing pattern of misconduct. The key issues that fueled the public’s outrage were systematic and widespread. One of the most shocking revelations was the practice of “fees for no service”, where major financial institutions knowingly charged customers, including those who had died, for financial advice that was never delivered. This blatant disregard for customer welfare generated billions of dollars in revenue for the banks, highlighting a deeply rooted problem.

Furthermore, the commission focused on irresponsible lending. In the rush to boost profits, banks were found to have approved home loans to borrowers who could not realistically afford them, often failing to properly verify their living expenses. This put countless Australian families at risk of financial ruin. The inquiry also shed light on the aggressive sale of “junk insurance”, where vulnerable customers were sold worthless or unnecessary policies that offered little to no chance of a successful claim. The aggressive sales tactics and high commissions for financial advisers were at the heart of these issues, creating a severe conflict of interest that corrupted the relationship between the financial services provider and the client.

Hayne’s Damning Findings: A Culture of Greed

Justice Hayne’s inquiry was a meticulous and often theatrical process, holding 68 days of public hearings and hearing from over 130 witnesses, including the CEOs and chairs of Australia’s largest financial institutions. The testimony was explosive, revealing a staggering lack of accountability and awareness at the highest levels of management. The final report, released in February 2019, was a powerful and comprehensive condemnation of the entire sector. Hayne’s central finding was that the misconduct was not the work of a few “rotten apples,” but a direct consequence of a “systemic failure” driven by a culture of greed.

The report identified several core failures. First, it concluded that the primary cause of misconduct was a relentless focus on sales and profit. The internal remuneration and bonus structures were designed to incentivize employees to push products, often with little regard for the suitability or needs of the customer. Second, the report highlighted a profound erosion of accountability among senior leadership and boards of directors. Hayne found a pervasive culture of passing the buck, where executives either chose to ignore or were not fully informed of the widespread misconduct, allowing it to fester unchecked. Lastly, the commission delivered a harsh critique of the regulatory bodies, particularly ASIC. Hayne argued that regulators had favored negotiation and enforceable undertakings over litigation and punishment, creating a climate of impunity that failed to deter misconduct. This led to his now-famous recommendation that regulators should adopt a “why not litigate?” approach.

The Aftermath: A Path Towards Reform

The Royal Commission’s findings sent shockwaves throughout the financial services industry and prompted immediate action from the Australian government. The government accepted and committed to implementing almost all of the report’s 76 recommendations, leading to a fundamental reshaping of the regulatory and corporate landscape. The immediate consequences were dramatic. Several high-profile CEOs and chairs of Australia’s largest banks, superannuation funds, and insurance companies were forced to resign, marking a new era of accountability at the top.

In response to the inquiry, the government introduced new legislation that strengthened the powers of regulatory bodies like ASIC and APRA. ASIC, in particular, has since adopted a far more aggressive enforcement posture, leading to a significant increase in legal actions and substantial fines for financial institutions. The industry itself has also been forced to change. Banks have paid out billions of dollars in remediation to customers who were harmed by their misconduct, and many have begun to sell off their wealth management and insurance arms to focus on their core banking operations.

Previous Post From Convicts and Commerce to Modernity: A History of Banking in Australia

Next Post A Dynamic Landscape: Poland’s Leading Banks and the Modern Banking Sector