SKN | Bank of America Warns of Waning Investor Appetite for AI Infrastructure as European Equities Rotate

Key Takeaways:

• BofA’s warning: Bank of America sees growing reluctance among investors to finance the expansion of AI infrastructure, with signs emerging since early October.
• Funding pressure: A withdrawn IPO, elevated borrowing costs at CoreWeave, and a weak debut for South Korean neocloud Elice point to challenges across parts of the AI financing ecosystem.
• European market reversal: The MSCI Europe AI Capex Select Index has fallen around 15% from its early-October high, amid a pronounced shift from cyclical to defensive equities.

Bank of America Identifies a Shift in AI Financing Appetite

Bank of America (BofA) is warning that investors are becoming less willing to finance the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure. In an analysis cited by Investing.com, the bank’s analysts said signs of this shift had increased since early October, raising questions about the sustainability of capital flows supporting AI data centres and related infrastructure.

The bank’s assessment matters because the AI investment cycle requires substantial funding for computing capacity, data centres, and associated technology. If investor appetite weakens, companies seeking to expand may face more demanding financing conditions, potentially affecting the pace and economics of planned investment.

BofA’s warning is based on several market developments rather than a single transaction. Together, these examples suggest that investors are becoming more selective about the businesses and financing structures associated with AI infrastructure.

Financing Signals Point to Greater Investor Selectivity

One example cited was Firmus, an AI data-centre developer that withdrew its planned initial public offering because of weak demand. The development illustrates the difficulty of accessing public equity markets when investor interest does not meet a company’s expectations.

Credit markets have also shown signs of pressure. CoreWeave, described in the report as the largest neocloud, saw yields on its unsecured bonds maturing in 2032 reach 15%. Its shares then fell approximately 15% the following day amid reports of its ambition to access what was described as “unlimited” insurance-company capital.

South Korean neocloud Elice also fell more than 30% below its IPO price on its first trading day, although it subsequently recovered some of that decline. These cases do not establish that all AI infrastructure businesses face identical financing conditions, but they illustrate the importance of investor confidence and funding costs to the sector.

BofA Highlights a Sharp Rotation in European Equities

The shift has extended to European companies benefiting from AI-related capital expenditure. The MSCI Europe AI Capex Select Index has declined approximately 15% from its early-October peak, erasing its gains since the late-July low.

BofA characterised the move as the sharpest cyclical-to-defensive rotation since the Covid period. The 12-month rolling correlation between the AI-capex index and European cyclical stocks relative to defensive stocks has risen above 90%, compared with approximately 25% a year earlier.

The figures indicate that AI-related equities have become more closely aligned with the broader rotation between economically sensitive and defensive sectors. They do not, by themselves, prove that AI investment will contract or that the technology’s long-term commercial potential has diminished.

What Investors Should Monitor Next

BofA’s analysis puts the emphasis on financing conditions as well as expected AI demand. Investors should monitor IPO activity, borrowing costs, equity-market reception, and whether AI infrastructure companies can secure capital on commercially sustainable terms. Further declines in financing availability could pressure expansion plans, while renewed investor demand could ease those constraints.

The central issue is whether capital-intensive AI growth can continue to attract funding at acceptable costs. For investors managing diversified global portfolios, BofA’s warning reinforces the importance of distinguishing long-term technological opportunity from the near-term financing conditions supporting it.

For a confidential discussion regarding your cross-border banking structure and global wealth management arrangements, contact our senior advisory team.