SKN | Goldman Sachs Leads Wall Street’s Equity Trading Revenue as Market Conditions Become More Selective

Key Takeaways:

• Goldman Sachs is expected to generate $5.1 billion in third-quarter equity trading revenue, ahead of Morgan Stanley’s projected $4.9 billion.
• Five major U.S. banks are forecast to report nearly $19 billion in combined equity trading revenue, while fixed-income trading revenue is expected to decline from the second quarter.
• Higher interest rates, rising funding costs and concerns about AI-driven cash management tools are weighing on bank valuations despite continued capital markets activity.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is positioned to lead Wall Street’s equity trading business in the third quarter, with analysts forecasting $5.1 billion in revenue from stock trading as major U.S. banks prepare to report earnings next week. The outlook points to a more differentiated environment for capital markets businesses, following a first half in which strong trading activity benefited a broad range of major lenders.

Goldman Sachs Maintains Its Trading Advantage

According to analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs is expected to generate the highest equity trading revenue among the major U.S. banks, followed by Morgan Stanley at $4.9 billion. JPMorgan Chase is forecast to report $4.5 billion, while Bank of America’s equity trading revenue is projected at $2.6 billion.

The expected figures underscore Goldman’s position in a market where trading performance is becoming less uniform. Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo has warned that the third quarter could produce a wider gap between winners and underperformers than in the first half of 2026, when equity and fixed-income trading activity supported results across much of the banking sector.

For Goldman, the projected equity trading performance will be an important component of its upcoming earnings report. Investors will be looking for evidence that its markets franchise can sustain revenue generation as other capital markets activities face a less favorable interest-rate environment.

Higher Rates Create Pressure on Fixed-Income Trading

While equity trading is expected to remain a significant source of revenue, fixed-income businesses face a more difficult backdrop. The five largest U.S. banks are forecast to generate more than $19 billion in fixed-income trading revenue during the third quarter, down from more than $21 billion in the second quarter. The projected decline would make the period the weakest for fixed-income trading revenue so far this year across the five banks.

Higher rates can improve lending economics when banks earn more interest on customer loans. However, they can also complicate trading conditions and introduce additional volatility into balance sheets. This distinction matters for Goldman Sachs, whose capital markets performance depends on trading activity rather than relying exclusively on traditional lending income.

Funding Costs and AI Concerns Shape Bank Valuations

The trading outlook comes amid broader pressure on bank shares. The KBW Bank Index recorded its worst quarterly performance since the first quarter of 2023, when the U.S. regional banking crisis began. Investors have become increasingly concerned about slower capital markets revenue growth, higher funding costs and the potential for artificial intelligence-driven cash optimization tools to redirect deposits away from traditional banks.

Morgan Stanley analyst Manan Gosalia identified these factors as contributors to the recent weakness in bank stocks. For Goldman Sachs, the implications extend beyond trading revenue: sustained funding pressure and uncertainty around deposit retention could influence profitability expectations and market valuations even if equity trading remains comparatively strong.

What Investors Should Monitor

Goldman Sachs’ upcoming results will help establish whether its equity trading strength can offset softer fixed-income performance and broader pressure on bank valuations. Investors should assess the balance between trading revenue, funding costs and management commentary on market conditions. The key distinction is whether Goldman’s expected leadership reflects durable franchise strength or a quarter-specific advantage in a more selective trading environment.

For a confidential discussion regarding your cross-border banking structure, contact our senior advisory team.